Top Pa. drug official denies blame for addiction treatment and medical marijuana controversy


The leader of a state firm that stopped working to clarify guidelines around addiction treatment and medical marijuana– an action that had severe effects– ongoing to reject blame while speaking prior to state legislators this month.

Jennifer Smith, secretary for the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, likewise doubled down on an description that moved duty to the federal government and county authorities– without acknowledging that both federal and county authorities challenge her claims.

” I believed her reaction was absolutely insufficient,” state Rep. John Lawrence (R., Chester) informed Spotlight PA, after questioning Smith.

A series of investigative stories by Spotlight PA in 2015 exposed that state authorities stopped working to clarify federal guidelines around addiction treatment financing and medical marijuana use, sowing prevalent confusion amongst employees on the cutting edge of Pennsylvania’s opioid epidemic. In one case, a 24-year-old Bucks County guy, Tyler Cordeiro, was mistakenly rejected opioid addiction treatment financing and passed away from a drug overdose a couple of weeks later on.

A month after Spotlight PA’s very first examination, the federal government altered its policy, removing the language that triggered one of the most confusion. Under the brand-new assistance, cash from the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Solutions Administration “might not be used to purchase, recommend, or provide marijuana or treatment utilizing marijuana.” However the language makes it clear that federal cash can money addiction treatment and other services for people who occur to use marijuana.

Throughout a March 3 spending plan hearing, Lawrence checked out from Spotlight PA’s coverage for almost 3 minutes.

” I desire to understand why DDAP sat on this federal assistance for 17 months and didn’t share it with other state and county companies,” Lawrence informed Smith.

” Thank you for asking that concern,” Smith responded, “and for offering me the chance to set the record directly based on possibly some mistakes or misinforming … reporting by Spotlight PA.”

She did not define what she thought about unreliable or deceptive about the reporting. Prior to releasing its examinations, Spotlight PA shared in-depth questions and findings with her firm.

Smith acknowledged that the department got clarifying information from the federal Drug abuse and Mental Health Solutions Administration in a January 2020 e-mail– 17 months prior to her department shared the assistance. However she declared her firm was not provided “consent to disperse that information beyond the participants of the call, which was limited to one individual from each state.”

E-mails acquired by Spotlight PA reveal a federal official welcomed the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs’ deputy secretary to a Q&A session “on the marijuana language” and other concerns in November 2019.

The federal firm then sent out composed explanation to the department on Jan. 1, 2020, e-mails reveal. A representative for the federal firm formerly stated it shared the composed assistance with Smith’s department and comparable companies that collaborate addiction treatment services in other states.

In neither the November 2019 nor January 2020 e-mails did the federal firm say state authorities might not share the information with other companies. The Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs’ press workplace did not provide or point to other e-mails or files to corroborate Smith’s claim that the department was not enabled to disperse the information.

And federal authorities have actually insisted they thought about the January 2020 email an official interaction that the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs had the authority to share.

” SAMHSA desired to make certain states understood how SAMHSA financing might and might not be used,” a representative for the federal firm informed Spotlight PA in September.

A minimum of another state offered extra assistance to itsproviders The Oregon Health Authority launched public assistance dated Nov. 18, 2019– days after the arranged phone call with SAMHSA– that clarified the medical marijuana financing problem and kept in mind there was versatility.

” Like all other states, [Oregon Health Authority] spoken with with SAMHSA to clarify and comprehend the brand-new unique conditions and shared that information with Oregon providers,” Aria Seligmann, an firm representative, informed Spotlight PA in an e-mail.

Smith likewise informed legislators that her department motivated county drug and alcohol workplaces to connect straight to the federal government to clarify the problem– an account that leaders of those workplaces have actually contested. That was a current modification, they informed Spotlight PA in September.

And the department’s own records cast doubt on Smith’s declarations that her firm regularly referred medical marijuana questions to the federal government.

Email exchanges in March and April of in 2015, for circumstances, program authorities with Delaware County’s drug and alcohol workplace asking for and getting assistance from Smith’s firm prior to a regional not-for-profit included medical marijuana constraints to an individual arrangement. An official with the Delaware County not-for-profit raised the constraints after speaking with a Spotlight PA press reporter in September.

A DDAP representative, Stephany Dugan, decreased to remark on the exchange in between the department and Delaware County. Dugan used 2 examples of when the department directed questions to the federal government. Both e-mails were from August 2021– 19 months after SAMHSA initially shared its composed explanation.

By that point, Spotlight PA had actually currently reported on the effects of the department’s failure to share the assistance, and the federal government had actually altered its policy.

Contrasting messages

Susan Ousterman, mom of the Bucks County guy who was mistakenly rejected addiction treatment financing, called Smith’s reaction to Lawrence’s questions “rather shocking.”

” Like I had actually stated from the start, you can’t fix something if you do not acknowledge that there was an issue,” Ousterman informed Spotlight PA. “And they still have not acknowledged that anything was … done incorrect.”

Ousterman connected to state authorities with issues about her boy’s case and gain access to to addiction treatment in early 2021 and remained in touch with them for months. She likewise raised issues about the precision of a state marketing campaign that guarantees to get everybody into treatment regardless of their gain access to to insurance.

Emails Spotlight PA acquired through Right-to- Know demands reveal prevalent confusion and contrasting messages over what counties need to do.

Jodi Skiles, a bureau director for the department, safeguarded the marketing campaign in an e-mail to Ousterman in late Might, informing her that county drug and alcohol workplaces establish their policies based on the department’s guidelines.

” And, our requirement is to fund the uninsured and underinsured with the State and Federal cash that we designate to each SCA,” Skiles composed, referring to the workplaces. “They likewise have a regional match.”

However lots of counties thought federal cash was off limitations if patients used medical marijuana for mental health or substance use concerns. And employees in some counties took the limitation even more, running as though all cash from county drug and alcohol workplaces was off limitations to people with a medical marijuana card for those factors, Spotlight PA discovered.

Skiles’ declarations to Ousterman in Might 2021 likewise dispute with later on ones by Smith. Smith informed Spotlight PA in August that it was up to the counties to choose what financing they felt comfy utilizing.

Regardless of Smith’s public obstacle to Spotlight PA reporting, internal e-mails reveal the wire service’s examinations triggered modifications.

After Spotlight’s very first story released in June, the department’s interactions director, Ali Gantz, composed to coworkers that “this piece is doing more damage than great by possibly holding people back from calling the hotline and/or looking for help if they receive MMJ.”

However Gantz likewise recommended upgrading information in the department handbooks to “provide even more explanation,” which the department later on did. And Jennifer Newell, another bureau director, recommended clarifying with county drug and alcohol workplaces when they might use state cash to help people, stating there “appeared to be some confusion around that.”

E-mails reveal the federal firm emailed Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs authorities on July 30, notifying them that the federal government was upgrading its policy and eliminating the language that triggered one of the most confusion.

” FYI– Seems like we require to get this out to the field or Spotlight will be all over us for not interacting the modification,” Smith composed to others in her department on Aug. 2, quickly after 8 a.m.

The department sent a publication hours later on, informing drug and alcohol workplaces, providers, and the general public about the modification.

90.5 WESA partners with Spotlight PA, a collective, reader-funded newsroom producing responsibility journalism for all of Pennsylvania. More at spotlightpa.org



Leave a Comment

Our trained counselors are here to help answer anything.

Have Questions?